Start here
The free tool below runs entirely in this browser — no account, nothing stored or transmitted. Redact anything you would not want kept before you type it.
Open the companion tool →Why the record is the complaint
Labor authorities and unions ask the same three questions: what were you told, when, and what changed. A grievance that answers those with dates and documents is investigable; one that describes a feeling is not.
The request also matters. 'I want the monitoring explained' is harder to answer than 'I want written notice of what is collected and confirmation that it is not used for individual performance decisions without notice'.
The protocol
- Write the timeline: when the tool appeared, what you noticed, and the dates of any conversation about it.
- Send the three questions in writing — what is collected, who sees it, what decisions it informs — and keep the reply.
- Note any change that followed: a performance conversation, a schedule change, a metric you had never seen before.
- State the outcome you want in one sentence: written disclosure, an assurance about use, or a change in practice.
- Send the grievance to the right place: your manager first, then HR, then a union representative or the labor authority for your jurisdiction, in the order your workplace requires.
- Keep the file. Grievances that are closed without action become much stronger when a second issue arises.
What the tool does
Build a written grievance about workplace AI monitoring: the timeline, the questions you asked, the answers you received, and the outcome you want. It stores nothing and sends nothing.
Limit first: This is a documentation aid, not legal advice, and it does not determine whether any practice is unlawful. Employment rules differ widely by jurisdiction and contract.
Open the companion tool →One human next step
If your workplace has a union or works council, involve them before the third escalation — they often have a faster route than an external authority. If not, the labor authority for your country or state accepts complaints and can tell you what your options are.
Research log and safety checks
AI-assist path: not used for a verdict. This builds a dated internal record; the workplace's reply and the timeline are the evidence, and a generated summary would not be admissible in any process that follows. §6.10: not a frontier-pace topic.
§0.5 protection result: category is rights-recourse; crisis-adjacent: no; fear/urgency/scarcity toolkit used: no. The protective function is free and the paid feature is convenience only.