Start here
The free tool below runs entirely in this browser — no account, nothing stored or transmitted. Redact anything you would not want kept before you type it.
Open the companion tool →Why the specific question gets an answer
"How was this decided" is easy to deflect. A specific request — what factors were used, what data was considered, and whether a human reviewed it — is harder to ignore, and in some contexts it is a right with a deadline.
The letter works because it asks for things the decision-maker can actually produce, and it creates the dated paper trail you need if the answer is evasive or the decision needs challenging.
The protocol
- Enter the decision: what it was, who made it, and when.
- Generate the letter naming the factors, the data, and the human review requested.
- Send it through the official channel and keep the dated copy.
- If the answer is evasive or the deadline passes, escalate to the relevant agency.
What the tool does
Build an explanation-request letter naming the factors, the data, and the human review requested. It runs in this browser; nothing is sent or stored.
Limit first: This is a request-letter aid, not legal advice and not a guarantee of any answer. Keep the dated copy; it is what makes escalation possible.
Open the companion tool →One human next step
Send the letter through the official channel and keep the copy. If the answer is evasive, escalate to the relevant agency for the decision type.
Research log and safety checks
AI-assist path: not applicable — the letter is the reader's own dated request; a model draft would add nothing the reader cannot write, and the paper trail must be theirs. §6.10: not a frontier-pace topic.
§0.5 protection result: category is informed-consent-literacy; crisis-adjacent: no; fear/urgency/scarcity toolkit used: no. The protective function is free and the paid feature is convenience only.