Start here
The free tool below runs entirely in this browser — no account, nothing stored or transmitted. Redact anything you would not want kept before you type it.
Open the companion tool →Why the record beats the feeling
A reviewer — a company, the EEOC, or a state agency — responds to facts, not to a feeling of unfairness. The letter that moves is the one that lays out what happened, when, the pattern you observed, and the specific review you are asking for.
You do not need to prove what the algorithm did internally. You need to document the observable facts: the inputs you provided, the outcome, and any pattern — like identical qualifications with different results — that suggests the decision was not about the job.
The protocol
- Enter the facts: the role, the process, the outcome, and the timeline.
- Describe the pattern you observed — what makes the decision feel wrong.
- Generate the letter with the specific review you are requesting.
- Send it to the employer, and file in parallel with the EEOC or your state agency.
What the tool does
Build a factual hiring-complaint letter with a timeline, the pattern, and the review requested. It runs in this browser; nothing is sent or stored.
Limit first: This is a letter aid, not legal advice and not a guarantee of any outcome. For a specific discrimination claim, consult a qualified professional — deadlines apply.
Open the companion tool →One human next step
Send the letter to the employer and keep the copy. File in parallel with the EEOC or your state fair-employment agency — deadlines apply.
Research log and safety checks
AI-assist path: not applicable — a complaint letter must state the reader's own facts; a model draft risks inserting a pattern that did not happen. §6.10: not a frontier-pace topic.
§0.5 protection result: category is rights-recourse; crisis-adjacent: no; fear/urgency/scarcity toolkit used: no. The protective function is free and the paid feature is convenience only.