Start here
The free tool below runs entirely in this browser — no account, nothing stored or transmitted. Redact anything you would not want kept before you type it.
Open the companion tool →Why 'a human reviewed it' is usually unverifiable
The claim is easy to make and hard to check. Asking what the person reviewed, when, and under what criteria turns a slogan into an answer you can hold.
Some laws give you a right to human review; others give you a right to an explanation. Either way, the letter is the mechanism.
The protocol
- Identify the decision, the date, and the automated element you believe was involved.
- Ask whether a human reviewed the decision before it was issued, and who.
- Ask what information that person had, and whether the model's output was shown to them.
- Ask how to appeal and how to correct any inaccurate data used.
- Send it in writing, keep the date, and diarize the response window.
What the tool does
Build a human-review request letter It runs locally in this browser and sends nothing.
Limit first: This is a document-preparation aid, not legal advice. It cannot guarantee an outcome, and it does not know what a court, agency or company will decide.
Open the companion tool →Cost and free path
Cost: Free: one complete run in this browser, no account. Optional $4 one-time unlock allows unlimited runs of this tool on this browser. The free path and safety guidance never require payment.
Free path, in order (no cost):
- The issuing department's own appeal or complaints address
- The sector regulator (financial, housing, health, employment) — free to complain to
- LawHelp.org for free legal aid if a legal right to review applies
What this cannot do: It cannot guarantee an outcome, and it does not know what a court, agency or company will decide.
Sources checked 2026-10-03 · source bank reviewed against the live pages listed in metadata.
One human next step
Send the letter to the specific department that issued the decision, not general support; if the deadline passes without an answer, escalate to the regulator that oversees that sector.
Research log and safety checks
AI-assist path: not used for a verdict. This builder organises the reader's own documents and names an independent source; it does not infer authenticity, eligibility, or legal rights. §6.9/§6.10/§6.11 disclosed in the batch report; §6.12 status line carried in metadata as `status_line`.
§0.5 protection result: category is rights-recourse; crisis-adjacent: no; fear/urgency/scarcity toolkit used: no. The protective function is free and the paid feature is convenience only.